A story on Anchor Rising, a Rhode Island news blog, reports on how Homosexual-marriage rights activists are attempting to legalize Marriage in the state by a divorce. A homosexual couple “married” in Massachusetts and now living in RI is seeking a divorce. As Justin Katz rightly points out:
If Chief Family Court Judge Jeremiah S. Jeremiah Jr. decides to grant the divorce, he will have — despite all of the language throughout Rhode Island law proving marriage to be an opposite-sex affair — acknowledged that a marriage can indeed exist when the spouses are of the same sex. Combine such a decision with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling that Rhode Island need not be seen as forbidding same-sex marriages for the purposes of Massachusetts law, and same-sex marriage will have been successfully imported to Rhode Island purely via judicial maneuvering.
Here again is an example of the judiciary “making law” through subtle cases that seem reasonable at first glance, but then in turn force a major cultural change on the public that they themselves did not vote for. Marriage is defined by statute in RI and in most states as the union between a man and a woman. That statute does not violate any constitutional provision in either the RI constitution or the U.S. Constitution, so for a judge to “recognize” a gay couple by granting a divorce is another example of the judiciary making an end-run around the will of the people.